Skip to main content

Crisis Management: Apple's Response to Customer Findings

Whether a product recall for an automobile company, or corporate wrongdoing dumping oil in a lake, consumers wish for firms to be honest, forthright, and transparent in all their communication to the public. In Apple’s case, they are certainly in the business of building a reputation and creating trust. This must be done in an ethical and transparent manner to best serve your client or company’s interests.

The basic equation for Apple is: The more positive news the corporate PR team generates and the better it manages the negative stories of issues and crisis situations, the greater the chance the company can increase sales and revenue, engage stakeholders, and serve the market successfully. This may sound simple, but as any experienced corporate communicator  or business person can attest, it is far from simple. To “solve” this equation the corporation must be skilled, ethical, honest, as transparent as possible, and accountable to both internal and external stakeholders.
iphone 6s review 20 

The Need for Immediacy

Immediately after news has broken proving that Apple was knowingly throttling performance, the corporation should issue a statement on social media as well as the company website that an investigation is underway into accusation. During a crisis such as Apple has experienced, it is paramount to get ahead of the situation as much as possible. Most importantly, Apple should assess and understand the situation, what the media is reporting about the issue, and follow a crisis plan to remedy the dilemma facing the firms’ business. 
The objectives during a crisis such as this should be to protect the individuals and business endangered by the crisis, and ensure key audiences are kept informed, and the organizations reputation survives. Since this is a public relations issue, Apple can follow a rigid structure to address the public and it’s customers.
Just as the Public Relations Society of America Code of Ethics outlines, Apple should focus on “being honest and transparent in all communication with the media.” Being as transparent and open as possible can help stop future rumors and impassioned posts that may be surrounding the business. This honest communication can help diffuse customers switching to other phone manufacturers who may be contemplating this decision after the findings of slow performance by customers.
After receiving the full facts of the case, Apple should release a statement on social media and the company website outlining the complete story to make customers aware of the situation. In the statement the corporation should outline why they chose to follow this performance route, that there was a misunderstanding of what happened, and apologize directly to consumers.
Finally, the business could offer a potential incentive to current customers apologizing for the inconvenience, and reinforcing the utmost care Apple gives to all consumers. This goodwill towards their customers will be seen as human and sincere. A vital tactic to instill trust back within the customer base. 

The Battery Rundown

While many iPhone users have experienced perceived slowdowns due to iOS updates over the years, it appears that there’s now proof Apple is throttling processor speeds when a battery capacity deteriorates over time.
In an article from the Verge, a reputable technology news outlet, reporters tried to explain how and why this throttling was happening. 

"Geekbench developer John Poole has mapped out performance for the iPhone 6S and iPhone 7 over time, and has come to the conclusion that Apple’s iOS 10.2.1 and 11.2.0 updates introduce this throttling for different devices. iOS 10.2.1 is particularly relevant, as this update was designed to reduce random shutdown issues for the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6S. Apple’s fix appears to be throttling the CPU to prevent the phone from randomly shutting down. Geekbench reports that iOS 11.2.0 introduces similar throttling for iPhone 7 units with older batteries.

Some Reddit users report that replacing their batteries has returned performance and CPU clock speeds back to normal. The reports are particularly troubling because any perceived slowdowns by iPhone users might tempt owners to upgrade their entire device instead of replace the battery. “This fix will also cause users to think, 'my phone is slow so I should replace it' not, 'my phone is slow so I should replace its battery,’” says Geekbench’s John Poole.”

Apple’s Formal Statement

On December 28th, 2017 Apple issued a formal statement addressing their decision to slowdown performance of older iPhone models to help preserve battery life. This statement comes almost 10 days after Reddit users noticed that Apple may have been throttling performance. Customer and media reports quickly emerged following these claims showing proof that that these claims were in fact true.
In the formal press release, titled ‘A Message to our Customers about iPhone Batteries and Performance,’ Apple attempts to rectify the situation facing thousands of iPhone owners. The full release can be read here.
“We’ve been hearing feedback from our customers about the way we handle performance for iPhones with older batteries and how we have communicated that process. We know that some of you feel Apple has let you down. We apologize. There’s been a lot of misunderstanding about this issue, so we would like to clarify and let you know about some changes we’re making.
First and foremost, we have never — and would never — do anything to intentionally shorten the life of any Apple product, or degrade the user experience to drive customer upgrades. Our goal has always been to create products that our customers love, and making iPhones last as long as possible is an important part of that.”

The statement goes on to educate customers about how batteries age, and their reasoning behind deciding to alter iOS code to throttle performance. 

Preventing unexpected shutdowns
"It should go without saying that we think sudden, unexpected shutdowns are unacceptable. We don’t want any of our users to lose a call, miss taking a picture or have any other part of their iPhone experience interrupted if we can avoid it.

About a year ago in iOS 10.2.1, we delivered a software update that improves power management during peak workloads to avoid unexpected shutdowns on iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, iPhone 6s, iPhone 6s Plus, and iPhone SE. With the update, iOS dynamically manages the maximum performance of some system components when needed to prevent a shutdown. While these changes may go unnoticed, in some cases users may experience longer launch times for apps and other reductions in performance.

Customer response to iOS 10.2.1 was positive, as it successfully reduced the occurrence of unexpected shutdowns. We recently extended the same support for iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus in iOS 11.2.
Of course, when a chemically aged battery is replaced with a new one, iPhone performance returns to normal when operated in standard conditions.”

Lastly, Apple addresses customer concerns by offering incentives and discounts to replace current phone batteries.

Addressing customer concerns
"We’ve always wanted our customers to be able to use their iPhones as long as possible. We’re proud that Apple products are known for their durability, and for holding their value longer than our competitors’ devices.
To address our customers’ concerns, to recognize their loyalty and to regain the trust of anyone who may have doubted Apple’s intentions, we’ve decided to take the following steps:
  • Apple is reducing the price of an out-of-warranty iPhone battery replacement by $50 — from $79 to $29 — for anyone with an iPhone 6 or later whose battery needs to be replaced, available worldwide through December 2018. Details will be provided soon on apple.com.
  • Early in 2018, we will issue an iOS software update with new features that give users more visibility into the health of their iPhone’s battery, so they can see for themselves if its condition is affecting performance.
  • As always, our team is working on ways to make the user experience even better, including improving how we manage performance and avoid unexpected shutdowns as batteries age.
At Apple, our customers’ trust means everything to us. We will never stop working to earn and maintain it. We are able to do the work we love only because of your faith and support — and we will never forget that or take it for granted.”

A Good Start, But Not Completely Transparent

It is evident that Apple is now apologizing for not being clearer about how the changes it initiated to eliminate sudden shutdowns of iPhones would affect phone performance. Interestingly Apple has acknowledged this dip in performance is due to updating to a new operating system, iOS 11 present with bugs, that caused slowdowns.

“Over the course of this fall, we began to receive feedback from some users who were seeing slower performance in certain situations,” Apple says. “Based on our experience, we initially thought this was due to a combination of two factors: a normal, temporary performance impact when upgrading the operating system as iPhone installs new software and updates apps, and minor bugs in the initial release which have since been fixed.”
Apple says that it now believes, in addition to these other factors, that slower older iPhones are also being negatively affected by aged batteries which trigger their power smoothing.
“We now believe that another contributor to these user experiences is the continued chemical aging of the batteries in older iPhone 6 and iPhone 6s devices, many of which are still running on their original batteries.”

A years worth of issues finally addressed by Apple has lead to an immense loss of trust, and makes it increasingly difficult for the company to rebuild trust among its customers. In this crisis, it would be much easier, and more effective to be as honest and transparent as possible from the beginning about these complex technical fixes that many consumers may not understand. Instead Apple chose to explain these effects of software fixes much later to customers, which is a decision they will have to live with. It is strictly beyond optional for Apple to hold back information on the performance of their devices. Apple must suffer the consequences of lawsuits, discounts and free batteries, yet learn from this situation to be more transparent upfront to customers in the future.

Although Apple did the right thing, and apologized to consumers, their apology is far from perfect. Apple failed to inform users of what was actually going on. In the statement, Apple never acknowledges that it misled iPhone users when it released the iOS 10-11 updates last year. Second, they are inferring that they are not properly testing updates for older iPhones, which meant having to wait for feedback from users that their aged iPhones were experiencing slowdowns. The main selling point for Apple devices is that they are supported by iOS updates for 5+ years. But with this situation arising, users of old iPhones may be thrown aback that Apple does not care about its older devices, only the new flagship models.

A crisis that is not managed promptly can be detrimental to a business’ reputation. By managing this crisis by thinking about all stakeholders involved, and acting much quicker, Apple could have initiated a well thought out plan to limit the amount of customer distrust driven by this ethical issue.

Sources:
The Verge
Apple Formal Statement

Comments

Anonymous said…
I can speak from personal experience that I felt betrayed by Apple when i learned about their battery and software "scandal". With that being said I will continue to use and buy their products. My question for you is do you think Apple really cares about what their consumers think? If millions of consumers have the same mindset as me, Apple is going to continue to sell their product and dominate the industry. People are so addicted and dependant to Apple products that it seems like no matter what Apple does they will continue to support their product. Do you think it is the case? If it is then Apple is really taking advantage of people and I think it is highly unethical.
Anonymous said…
In this case, I think Apple played their cards right. I think they were able to calm the storm and maintain their image by apologizing about the customer experience that might've been diminished because of the new software updates, but never apologizing and admitting to what they did. They used a political way to answer and emphasized how customer experience is important to them etc. I like how you weren't naïve with your blog and realized that Apple was not completely transparent even though they lowered the price for their warranty and placed a team in charge of improving customer experience. According to me, they tried to save face rather than really making a change. I was wondering if you think that this will become a recurring issue with Apple in the future. Do you think if studies are made about the new iPhone X in a couple of years, that we will still find Apple trying to lower customer experience to sell their new products?
ABrubacher said…
Nick, I don’t believe Apple thought through how consumers would truly react if this information regarding slow CPU performance to help with battery degradation got out to the media. Consumers are savvy these days and news travels instantaneously. It should have been the first thing on their minds when issuing the update…how will consumers respond? I too felt betrayed during this battery scandal. How could a company I trust do this to me? I believe the Apple ecosystem has a lot to do with customers sticking with Apple. If you have many Apple devices, they all work simultaneously together. You can start a document on your iPhone and seamlessly pick it up on your laptop, or take a call on your Apple watch, and continue it on your iPad. Thats why people love Apple. The harmonious nature of their products. But if Apple keeps this unethical behavior up in the future, many will have had enough and start to switch brands for-sure.

Adam
ABrubacher said…
Shawn, I actually looked into what Apple has said about continuing this software update for their new phones in the future. They have in fact issued statements that the “CPU throttling” will not affect newer iPhones. But just this past week I read an article that consumers are believing that this same tactic of slowing down iPhones is happening again to the iPhone X. Now Apple has installed a software option that allows users to choose between maximum CPU speed and performance, or increased battery life. The battery replacements are still $29 up until December 31, 2018, which will solve the problem of battery degradation for a small fee. But as you said, it looked as though Apple was trying to cover up the problem, rather than make a change for the better. They could have undergone many options instead of trying to save face, by being honest and transparent right when issuing the software update.

Adam
Anonymous said…
I've been using Apple products for a long time now and I know that this incident affected me temporarily but I got over it pretty quick. I think Apple was too late on there response to the public, it seemed that they were keeping this deep secret engraved in their company until it started popping up on popular websites like Reddit. Do you think if people didn't notice the drainage of their battery that Apple would have eventually admitted it anyways? I know for me I just thought my iPhone was getting old but I'm not too tech savvy as it is. I don't believe Apple is too concerned about this scandal as they will always have customers waiting at the door to buy their product but I believe an incident like this if they continue to happen will affect the loyalty and trust of Apple and their customers.
Anonymous said…
In a situation like this when a company makes a blunder I find that sometimes its more about what they do after than what they actually did. I know that what they did in hiding the fact they were participating in the so called "CPU Throttling" was definitely an error in corporate judgement but I think it was the handling of the scandal that was the true issue. They may have apologized but you were right in your post when you said it was clearly not what many would consider an adequate apology. In the past it seemed like Apple had more of a dominance in the smartphone industry but I think with the tougher competition they face now that this blunder could have a lasting impact in the future on their market share. They may have changed their policies on the throttling of their batteries but do you think this blunder will keep them more vigilant moving forward or will they continue on the same path by making different mistakes?
ABrubacher said…
Brody, I too have been plagued personally by this ethical dilemma. I think Apple was too late on there response to the public, and made it look like they were certainly hiding something from consumers. In fact, it looked as if they did not actually apologize, and tried to shift the blame of the scandal onto consumers, for possibly using their phones incorrectly. I don’t think that if people didn't notice the drainage of their battery that Apple would have eventually admitted it. The old saying goes, “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it,” and in this case, I believe this is the strategy Apple would have went with. If consumers did not know about the battery degradation, Apple could sell more battery replacement, and push people to upgrade to their newer phones. I am still on the edge if I believe Apple did this subtle trick on purpose, or to actually help the consumer, and I may never have a true answer.

Adam
ABrubacher said…
Ryan, as I have been taught in my public relations course this semester, it is paramount for a company to have an effective crisis management plan in place to ratify a situation like this. What Apple did to customers iPhones was definitely wrong, but how they handled the time after the incident was even worse in my mind. Although Apple did the right thing, and apologized to consumers, their apology is far from perfect. Apple failed to inform users of what was actually going on. In the public statement, Apple never acknowledges that it misled iPhone users when it released the software update in question. They simply imply that batteries are prone to degradation, and that it is common. They attest the problem to human error. I think that this event will make Apple more vigilant to these problems in the future. With such consumer backlash they would be ignorant not to see what effect this scandal had on public opinion on the Apple brand. They need to step up in the future and be more honest with consumers.

Adam

Popular posts from this blog

An Ethical Approach: Apple's Course of Action

In December 2017, Apple, the consumer electronics giant, and a company valued at over $1 trillion was entrenched in a serious ethical business dilemma. It became public knowledge after many consumers brought to light that their iPhones were slowing down in their processing power. Apple, after much backlash, released a public apology stating that in fact, they initiated a software update, without consciously explaining what they were doing to the average consumer, that would slow down the CPU of older iPhones to help preserve battery degradation. The company claimed it was just a technical issue to do with aging batteries, and not a devious marketing ploy designed to encourage frustrated users to upgrade to a new phone. Critically, the company had failed to tell people that a simple battery replacement would solve the slowdown problem. After analyzing the approach the company decided to take, and what consumers, bloggers, reporters, influencers, and senators alike have said about the e...

A History of Apple: From A Garage in California to Worldwide Success

Chances are you would see multiple devices with the iconic Apple logo if you venture in to a university classroom, company boardroom, or even just walking down a New York city street. The Apple brand has become synonymous with innovation, prestige, and performance since its  inception in 1976. But what is Apple Inc. all about today? Their focus has shifted from strictly computing to creating and selling all forms of consumer electronics and online services. Gone are the days of the late Steve Jobs era, and with new management come new opportunity in the consumer electronics industry today. Brief History of Apple Apple Computing, founded in 1976 by college dropouts Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak, started with a vision to change the way people viewed the computer. Starting with their first ever product, the Apple I computer, the pair developed and sold the device from Jobs’ garage in California. This was unlike the computers we know today, without a case, keyboard, or monitor....